From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20168 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 21:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20157 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 21:31:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.18.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 21:31:12 -0000 Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107]) by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C734DDF1; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:31:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:23:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: David O'Brien Cc: Zack Weinberg , Andreas Jaeger , Jan Hubicka , Gerald Pfeifer , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target? Message-ID: <20021004213109.GD12365@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20021004172529.GD3642@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021004175836.GD6379@codesourcery.com> <20021004201406.GC23838@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021004201406.GC23838@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:58:36AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > Well, I would suggest annotating the PR with the change log entry of > > the patch that fixed it, if this can be determined, or just 'works for > > me with , , ' otherwise. > > That would be very good information to have in the PR. OK, this looks good, I will try to use this scheme next time.