From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61122-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25074 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2002 10:33:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25062 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2002 10:33:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2002 10:33:20 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 77FCFF2DCF; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 06:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
To: dewar@gnat.com, wilson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: deprecate i960 now?
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20021005103320.77FCFF2DCF@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 05:56:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2

<<But are any of them considering using gcc 3?  If none of them are ever going
to upgrade to gcc 3, then we don't need the i960 port in gcc 3.
>>

They are certaqinly not using gcc 3 now, since they are using gnat, I don
't know about future plans, to be checked