* RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
@ 2002-10-07 14:05 Valle, Adam
2002-10-07 14:30 ` Robert Lipe
2002-10-07 15:05 ` Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valle, Adam @ 2002-10-07 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Robert Lipe'; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Have you heard of any issues (good or bad) with any gcc versions on SCO
OpenServer 5.0.2 SCO OpenServer 5.0.3, or UnixWare?
Thanks,
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Lipe [mailto:robertlipe@usa.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Valle, Adam
Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Subject: Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
Valle, Adam wrote:
> On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/buildstat.html , there are two listings for
> OpenServer 5.0.5 :
> i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
> i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
>
> Was one of these intended for OpenServer 5.0.4?
I would assume no typos. 5.0.4 is a pretty tenured release these days.
The above results are telling you that it succeeded targeting either
processor.
GCC tickles a couple of bugs in the assembler and linker on the OS of
that vintage. There was a TLS (TLS706, I think) that fixed a number of
these problems.
> Has there been a successfull release of gcc 2.95 on this platform?
I recall the source release pretty much Just Working. There were binary
kits put up on www.caldera.com/skunkware.
Signed,
Your Fellow Nashvillian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
2002-10-07 14:05 SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam
@ 2002-10-07 14:30 ` Robert Lipe
2002-10-07 15:05 ` Robert Lipe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 2002-10-07 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valle, Adam; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Valle, Adam wrote:
> Have you heard of any issues (good or bad) with any gcc versions
Yes.
If you ask a specific question, your odds of getting a helpful answer
increase greatly.
> on SCO OpenServer 5.0.2 SCO OpenServer 5.0.3, or UnixWare?
SCO OpenServer 5.0.3 was never released.
RJL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
2002-10-07 14:05 SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam
2002-10-07 14:30 ` Robert Lipe
@ 2002-10-07 15:05 ` Robert Lipe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 2002-10-07 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valle, Adam; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Valle, Adam wrote:
> Have you heard of any issues (good or bad) with any gcc versions on SCO
> OpenServer 5.0.2 SCO OpenServer 5.0.3, or UnixWare?
Yes. Perhaps you have a specific question that can be answered.
OpenServer 5.0.3 never existed.
RJL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
@ 2002-10-07 17:25 Valle, Adam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valle, Adam @ 2002-10-07 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Robert Lipe'; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
What noteworthy issues, good or bad, have you found with compiling and
linking OpenSSL or linking _to_ OpenSSL libraries on SCO OpenServer 5.0.2 or
UnixWare?
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Lipe [mailto:robertlipe@usa.net]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Valle, Adam
Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Subject: Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
Valle, Adam wrote:
> Have you heard of any issues (good or bad) with any gcc versions
Yes.
If you ask a specific question, your odds of getting a helpful answer
increase greatly.
> on SCO OpenServer 5.0.2 SCO OpenServer 5.0.3, or UnixWare?
SCO OpenServer 5.0.3 was never released.
RJL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
@ 2002-07-26 23:56 Valle, Adam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valle, Adam @ 2002-07-26 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Robert Lipe'; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
I just installed the skunkware GCC 2.95.2 package and I have actually
compiled something that works.
Thanks for your help!
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Lipe [mailto:robertlipe@usa.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Valle, Adam
Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Subject: Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
Valle, Adam wrote:
> On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/buildstat.html , there are two listings for
> OpenServer 5.0.5 :
> i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
> i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
>
> Was one of these intended for OpenServer 5.0.4?
I would assume no typos. 5.0.4 is a pretty tenured release these days.
The above results are telling you that it succeeded targeting either
processor.
GCC tickles a couple of bugs in the assembler and linker on the OS of
that vintage. There was a TLS (TLS706, I think) that fixed a number of
these problems.
> Has there been a successful release of gcc 2.95 on this platform?
I recall the source release pretty much Just Working. There were binary
kits put up on www.caldera.com/skunkware.
Signed,
Your Fellow Nashvillian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
@ 2002-07-25 14:24 Valle, Adam
2002-07-25 16:03 ` Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valle, Adam @ 2002-07-25 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'gcc@gnu.org'
On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/buildstat.html , there are two listings for
OpenServer 5.0.5 :
i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
Successful
i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
Successful
Was one of these intended for OpenServer 5.0.4? Has there been a
successfull release of gcc 2.95 on this platform?
Thank you,
Adam Valle
Programmer
WebMD ENVOY
615-886-9336
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
2002-07-25 14:24 Valle, Adam
@ 2002-07-25 16:03 ` Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 2002-07-25 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valle, Adam; +Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org'
Valle, Adam wrote:
> On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/buildstat.html , there are two listings for
> OpenServer 5.0.5 :
> i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
> i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5
> Successful
>
> Was one of these intended for OpenServer 5.0.4?
I would assume no typos. 5.0.4 is a pretty tenured release these days.
The above results are telling you that it succeeded targeting either
processor.
GCC tickles a couple of bugs in the assembler and linker on the OS of
that vintage. There was a TLS (TLS706, I think) that fixed a number of
these problems.
> Has there been a successfull release of gcc 2.95 on this platform?
I recall the source release pretty much Just Working. There were binary
kits put up on www.caldera.com/skunkware.
Signed,
Your Fellow Nashvillian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-07 22:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-07 14:05 SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam
2002-10-07 14:30 ` Robert Lipe
2002-10-07 15:05 ` Robert Lipe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-07 17:25 Valle, Adam
2002-07-26 23:56 Valle, Adam
2002-07-25 14:24 Valle, Adam
2002-07-25 16:03 ` Robert Lipe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).