public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>,
	nathan@cs.bris.ac.uk, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@codesourcery.com, gdr@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 09:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210081429.g98ETK626187@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Oct 2002 14:17:53 BST." <wvl1y71gjcu.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

> On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 14:03:36 +0100, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Except, of course, that c99 says that only an "ordinary indentifier" may 
> > be a VLA.
> 
> I don't see that.  It says that only an ordinary identifier can have a VM
> type, but seems to specifically avoid saying the same thing about VLAs.
> 
> Jason

But 6.7.5 para 3 says that a VLA has VM type.  And in example 4 in 6.7.5.2 
para 10 shows that z[n] is not valid as a struct member.

R.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-08 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-08  1:45 Mark Mitchell
2002-10-08  5:35 ` Nathan Sidwell
2002-10-08  6:18   ` Jason Merrill
2002-10-08  6:22     ` Neil Booth
2002-10-08  7:07       ` Jason Merrill
2002-10-08  7:28         ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-10-08  7:31           ` Jason Merrill
2002-10-08  9:12             ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-10-11  3:20               ` Jason Merrill
2002-10-08  9:04       ` Andreas Schwab
2002-10-08 10:31 ` Jim Wilson
2002-10-08 10:59   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-10-08 11:09   ` Jim Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200210081429.g98ETK626187@pc960.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=rearnsha@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdr@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=nathan@cs.bris.ac.uk \
    --cc=neil@daikokuya.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).