From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6853 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2002 15:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6840 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2002 15:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.18.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2002 15:15:58 -0000 Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107]) by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D18A4E2BF; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:15:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:15:56 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:19:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Nathan Sidwell Cc: Jan Hubicka , Qiong Cai , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3 Message-ID: <20021014151556.GB14971@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <3DA9280F.9070601@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021013181921.GG6766@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <3DAACAA7.9020209@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DAACAA7.9020209@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 > Jan Hubicka wrote: > > >It is complete and it should produce .da files. > >Does the program crash at the end? There seems to be common collision > >with the routines in glibc handling of profiler format. > do you think we should rename those routines for 3.3? > > (Separately) I think we should break them out of libgcc into a libgcov, > so that they work with a shared link of libgcc. We can have a spec which > turns -fcoverage into -lgcov. This is appropriate for 3.4, but is it > too for 3.3? I hope so. > > Oh, yes. Does your recent change to use the mangled name for functions > require tweaks in the stuff I did on b-i-b? Hope it will merge easilly. Honza > > nathan > > -- > Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC > 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?' > nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org >