From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61587-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20466 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2002 13:11:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20459 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 13:11:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc53.attbi.com) (204.127.198.39)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 13:11:42 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021015131141.NIKU17158.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@lucon.org>;
          Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:11:41 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BBCBF2C4EC; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 06:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:28:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Cc: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>,
	Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>, Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch>,
	GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
Message-ID: <20021015061141.B13451@lucon.org>
References: <09E11C02-DF9B-11D6-BBA1-00039379E320@apple.com> <3DAB04CD.9C674C41@superh.com> <20021014110015.A30940@lucon.org> <3DAC0F9C.49725F3B@superh.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <3DAC0F9C.49725F3B@superh.com>; from joern.rennecke@superh.com on Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:52:44PM +0100
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00811.txt.bz2

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:52:44PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:54:21PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> > > Jim Ingham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you have expect patches have you submitted them back to the expect
> > > > maintainers?  This is now hosted at SourceForge.
> > > >
> > > > This won't help gcc & gdb, because they use a weird hacked version of
> > > > expect - the current expect won't run the testsuite correctly.  But if
> > > > you have found some Linux bug, you should submit a patch to the
> > > > SourceForge patch tracker...
> > >
> > > I had already downloaded & installed the unaltered expect 5.38.0 .
> > > This has stopped expect from hanging, but the semi-random loss of output
> > > hasn't improved, if anything, it got worse.
> > > And no, I haven't got patches, I'm fishing for clues where to start.
> > >
> > 
> > Try the latest patch from
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
> 
> I get a message that the connection was refused by the server bugzilla.redhat.com .
> 	
> > Let me know if it works for you. If it does, I will file a bug report
> > for expect if it hasn't been fixed already.
> 
> In Jack Howarth's message in this thread (only by subject, not by reference),
> I found the link
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=156854&archive=yes&repeatmerged=yes
> and the patch there seems to work.  Running sh64-elf regression tests with this patch
> removes 87 spurious failures.

Good. That is the same patch. I will file a bug report against expect.


H.J.