From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61651-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7069 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2002 21:28:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7061 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 21:28:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bjl1.asuk.net) (81.29.64.88)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 21:28:23 -0000
Received: from bjl1.asuk.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bjl1.asuk.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9FLUuVn032403;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:30:56 +0100
Received: (from jamie@localhost)
	by bjl1.asuk.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g9FLUuvX032401;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:30:56 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: bjl1.asuk.net: jamie set sender to egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk using -f
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:19:00 -0000
From: Jamie Lokier <egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: Kevin Lawton <kevinlawton2001@yahoo.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
Message-ID: <20021015213056.GB31811@bjl1.asuk.net>
References: <20021015200247.GA31811@bjl1.asuk.net> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210152219210.20702-100000@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210152219210.20702-100000@wotan.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00875.txt.bz2

Michael Matz wrote:
> Does that make sense?

Yes it does.

cheers,
-- Jamie