From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61696-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25150 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 04:16:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25143 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 04:16:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 04:16:48 -0000
Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 181fYx-0002OM-00; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:13:39 -0700
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:07:00 -0000
To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: "Have we branched yet?"
Message-ID: <20021016041339.GV15067@codesourcery.com>
References: <20021016040414.GA13378@doctormoo.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021016040414.GA13378@doctormoo.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00920.txt.bz2

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:14AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Have we branched yet?

It's Mark's call, but I don't think the tree is in shape to be
branched.  Wanna fix some bugs?

zw