From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61740-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2243 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 16:21:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2236 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 16:21:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 16:21:24 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GGKfs20809;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:20:41 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GGLNl14904;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:21:23 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GGLND05470;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:21:23 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9GGLLe23004;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:21:21 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:29:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>,
   gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
Message-ID: <20021016162121.GB22988@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,
	Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <20021016093142.GH1083@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210161136290.20702-100000@wotan.suse.de> <20021016095534.GJ1083@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021016095534.GJ1083@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00964.txt.bz2

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:55:34AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> This is interesting.  Richard told me when I was working on reg-stack
> that the variables live across EH edges and not in registers.
> 
> Perhaps this is just because stack registers are not live across the
> calls after regalloc, but then it would be wrong at least for Java
> non-call-exceptions.

No, there's code to explicitly suppress STACK_REGS across
all abnormal edges, including non-call EH edges.


r~