From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61763-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24837 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 18:54:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24713 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 18:54:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tornado.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 18:54:09 -0000
Received: from tornado.toronto.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9GIrtMu006163;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:53:55 -0400
Received: (from dnovillo@localhost)
	by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g9GIrlA7006161;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:53:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:23:00 -0000
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: scox@redhat.com, ritu@csa.iisc.ernet.in, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
Message-ID: <20021016185347.GA6111@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
References: <200210161455.g9GEtq701173@scox.rdu.redhat.com> <u8elaq2pl4.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <u8elaq2pl4.fsf@gromit.moeb>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Organization: Red Hat Canada
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00987.txt.bz2

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> What kind of infrastructure do you speak about?  The new loop
> optimizer done by Zdenek, etc?   In that case it might make sense to
> add your code to the rtlopt branch...
> 
tree-ssa will eventually use this as well.  We're not doing any
dependence analysis at the moment, but that is in the medium term
plan.


Diego.