From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8373 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 22:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8365 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 22:03:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 22:03:19 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GM2Zs22558; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:02:35 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GM3Il16698; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:03:18 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9GM3HD16540; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:03:17 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9GM3FH30861; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:03:15 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:54:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Robert Dewar , "gdr@integrable-solutions.net" , "steve@moshier.net" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: real.c fails floating point tests Message-ID: <20021016220315.GC30823@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , Robert Dewar , "gdr@integrable-solutions.net" , "steve@moshier.net" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <20021016150559.2E290F28EA@nile.gnat.com> <312950000.1034791317@warlock.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <312950000.1034791317@warlock.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01014.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:01:57AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > (2) Richard, would you take a look at the bugs, as the architect of the > new code? Yes. I've been looking at the real_to_decimal problem reported yesterday already. r~