From: Michael Ritzert <ritzert@t-online.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 04:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210172150.22568.ritzert@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jebs5tp11v.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
I've been collecting bootstrap times for gcc HEAD on i386-unknown-freebsd4.5
on an Athlon 1000 for 3 months now. You can find the plot a
http://www.globe-tec.de/~ritzert/gcc.png . The first plot is the user time as
reported by 'make bootstrap', excluding 'make gnatlib_and_tools'. The second
dataset is the time it takes to compile STLport 4.5.3 on the same machine. I
do also have the object sizes recorded in case somebody cares.
As a short summary, bootstrap time has gone up from around 4150 seconds on
05/07 to ca. 4700s today.
The compile time for STLport is about the same as at the beginning of July,
but went up and down 10% respectively in between (the periods without crosses
mark failures to build STLport, the current one being caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00846.html ).
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-18 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-17 12:51 Diego Novillo
2002-10-17 13:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-10-18 4:34 ` Michael Ritzert [this message]
2002-10-18 4:52 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-10-18 5:42 ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-18 9:02 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-10-18 9:48 ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-18 12:34 ` David Edelsohn
2002-10-19 12:01 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-19 14:14 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-20 9:19 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-20 14:41 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-20 15:41 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-11-04 17:54 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-17 14:22 ` Neil Booth
2002-10-17 14:49 ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-17 17:10 Robert Dewar
2002-10-17 17:26 ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-19 13:51 Roger Sayle
2002-10-19 14:51 Roger Sayle
2002-10-19 17:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-20 1:23 ` Roger Sayle
2002-10-20 15:09 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-19 18:36 ` Geert Bosch
2002-10-20 5:46 ` Tim Prince
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210172150.22568.ritzert@t-online.de \
--to=ritzert@t-online.de \
--cc=dnovillo@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).