From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10688 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2002 11:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10678 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2002 11:22:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tornado.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2002 11:22:18 -0000 Received: from tornado.toronto.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9IBM7Mu023066; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:22:07 -0400 Received: (from dnovillo@localhost) by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g9IBM62Z023064; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:22:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:42:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: ritzert@t-online.de, schwab@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse Message-ID: <20021018112206.GA22977@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> References: <20021017144047.GA13629@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <200210180359.XAA24196@caip.rutgers.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210180359.XAA24196@caip.rutgers.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Red Hat Canada X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01094.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > That would be a proper "apples to apples" comparison upon which you > could draw conclusions about whether compile-time speed was slowing > down. I'm not saying it isn't slowing down, but that the figures > posted so far aren't actually measuring that AFAICT. > Very good point. I should've thought of that before. We could analyze SPEC build times instead. http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec95/gcc/global-build-secs_elapsed.html For CINT95 base, we have a 6% increase in build times since Sep19. There is a noticeable jump around Oct06. Diego.