public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021020002644.GA7700@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210191234420.9286-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:47:04PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> 
> > I still think it's worth shrinking processor_costs - we're getting
> > nickled and dimed to death on cache utilization, and this is a cheap
> > way to get quite a bit of space back.
> 
> I agree it does no harm, and potentially some good.

Thinking about it a bit more, the gain could be totally wiped out by
having to do more work to access byte fields.  I don't think this is a
problem for an x86 native compiler, but it'd be useful to
know. Sebastian, could you post size -A reports for stage3 cc1 before
and after the patch?

> Saving a few hundred bytes is a step in the right direction, even if
> it'll have little overall effect on GCC's multi-megabyte memory
> footprint.

I should finish the bytecoded-insn-recog.c patch RTH and I started
back in 1999.  How does ~200K off the size of the text segment sound?
(at a cost of 20-50K in .rodata, IIRC)

zw

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-20  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-19 14:51 Roger Sayle
2002-10-19 17:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-20  1:23   ` Roger Sayle
2002-10-20 15:09     ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2002-10-19 18:36 ` Geert Bosch
2002-10-20  5:46   ` Tim Prince
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-19 13:51 Roger Sayle
2002-10-17 17:10 Robert Dewar
2002-10-17 17:26 ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-17 12:51 Diego Novillo
2002-10-17 13:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-10-18  4:34   ` Michael Ritzert
2002-10-18  4:52   ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-10-18  5:42     ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-18  9:02       ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-10-18  9:48         ` Diego Novillo
2002-10-18 12:34           ` David Edelsohn
2002-10-19 12:01           ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-19 14:14             ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-20  9:19               ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-20 14:41                 ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-20 15:41                   ` Pop Sébastian
2002-11-04 17:54         ` Pop Sébastian
2002-10-17 14:22 ` Neil Booth
2002-10-17 14:49   ` Diego Novillo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021020002644.GA7700@codesourcery.com \
    --to=zack@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=roger@eyesopen.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).