From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25821 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 21:58:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25813 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 21:58:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 21:58:08 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18472L-0001w9-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:58:05 -0700 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:08:00 -0000 From: Zack Weinberg To: Janis Johnson Cc: Joe Buck , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs Message-ID: <20021022215805.GC1605@codesourcery.com> References: <200210222053.g9MKrUV13818@piper.synopsys.com> <20021022144141.A14045@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021022144141.A14045@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01385.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:41:42PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > I didn't see 6994, which is a regression from 2.95, on your list. Zack has > a possible patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-10/msg00372.html) but > nothing seems to have happened with it. I'm working on a revised version even as we speak. zw