From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17885 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 12:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17876 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 12:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de) (134.130.161.59) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 12:06:25 -0000 Received: from igpm.rwth-aachen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA37406; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:56:51 +0200 (CST) Message-Id: <200210231256.OAA37406@numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:05:00 -0000 From: Reichelt Subject: Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jbuck@synopsys.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01424.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm afraid I've got another bunch of bugs that qualify for "high priority" :-(. Could somebody please change their priority in GNATS? PR 7944: ice-on-legal-code, regression from 2.95.x (branch and trunk), probably target-specific (ix86) PR 8067: ice-on-legal-code, regression from 3.0.x (branch and trunk), there were some attempts to tackle the problem, but no patch got applied PR 5665: ice-on-illegal-code, regression from 3.0.x (trunk only), the problem already appeared in 3.1-20020204, but was fixed in 3.1. Greetings, Volker Reichelt