From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30096 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 16:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30089 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 16:57:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 16:57:28 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9NGuSP20315 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:56:28 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9NGvRl06560 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:57:27 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9NGvQD16868 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:57:26 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9NGvPD17746 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:57:25 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:04:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs Message-ID: <20021023165725.GB17719@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200210230152.g9N1qgA17124@piper.synopsys.com> <20021023134133.GC5058@rjlhome.caldera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021023134133.GC5058@rjlhome.caldera.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01434.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:41:33AM -0500, Robert Lipe wrote: > > 7623 (SCO, patch candidate in review as of Aug 17) > > I like this one better. Bootstrap is still in progress, but it does now > sail past the compilation error. > > May I commit this? Yes, this looks fine. r~