From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7821 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2002 15:34:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7734 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 15:34:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 15:34:47 -0000 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9OFYjX29644 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:34:45 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:41:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs Message-ID: <20021024173445.L3451@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <200210232118.g9NLIBD28171@piper.synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from prj@po.cwru.edu on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:32:10AM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01489.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:32:10AM -0400, Paul Jarc wrote: > Joe Buck wrote: > >> PR 8146 seems to me to be a regression from 2.95.3. It might be just > >> a problem in my (rather unusual) environment, though - has anyone > >> tried to reproduce it? (FWIW, I can reproduce it with stock gcc 3.2, > >> but not with the patched version Red Hat distributes with 8.0.) > > > > I suspect that almost all Red Hat's patches are in 3.2.1-pre as well. > > Could you test the 3.2 CVS branch or a recent 3.2-branch snapshot? > > I checked out the 3.2 branch yesterday and got the same error. Can you check gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch too? If you don't get an error there, the diff is not that big (if omitting TLS and visibility changes). Jakub