From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25785 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2002 13:51:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25692 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 13:51:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.208.78.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 13:51:53 -0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9PDpqeZ066066; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:51:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9PDppbN066065; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:05:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Eric Botcazou Cc: Richard Henderson , Andreas Jaeger , Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1 Message-ID: <20021025135151.GA66016@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20021024050120.GA4017@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <98BED62E-E70F-11D6-BD0B-000393122612@physics.uc.edu> <20021024053101.GA4124@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021024065215.GA4403@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021024223133.GB6054@redhat.com> <20021024225530.GA84211@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <01cb01c27bff$27a81900$624f24d5@fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01cb01c27bff$27a81900$624f24d5@fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01523.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:16:39AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > I've determined that the change that is causing the > > ICE went into the gcc-3.2 branch between the 8th > > of Octber and the 10th. In another 2 hours or > > so, I'll I know what is the actual cause. > > My patch for PR c/7411. The problem was detected by Andreas about one week > ago, and Jan Hubicka quickly proposed a fix, that Richard Henderson > suggested to improve. As it seems there has been no activity since then, I'm > going to test the fix. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-10/msg01098.html > Thanks. I misread one of my cvs chechkouts and I should have given the range of the 6th to the 10th of October. Hopefully, I didn't send you on a wild goose chase. -- Steve