From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13465 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 19:14:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13458 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2002 19:14:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2002 19:14:04 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18999I-0000RR-00 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:14:04 -0800 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:14:00 -0000 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk Message-ID: <20021105191404.GB1050@egil.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Zack Weinberg X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 The merge tag is gcc-3_4-basic-improvements-merge-20021105. Bootstrapped i686-linux; there are regressions relative to mainline, but they are not caused by this merge. --- ws.main 2002-11-05 11:10:55.000000000 -0800 +++ ws.bib 2002-11-05 11:10:41.000000000 -0800 @@ -28,9 +28,12 @@ FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -Os +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-1.c (test for excess errors) +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-2.c (test for excess errors) +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-3.c (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary === -# of expected passes 20539 -# of unexpected failures 5 +# of expected passes 20552 +# of unexpected failures 8 # of expected failures 64 # of unsupported tests 65 === g++ tests === I believe I know what is causing these failures, and will send a separate patch for them shortly. I would appreciate it if the HPPA maintainers would check the merge of pa.c; the function-call rewrite on the mainline clashed a bit with the conversion of ASM_OUTPUT_INTERNAL_LABEL to a target hook on the branch. I believe I got it correct but I don't have access to this platform to test it. zw