From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18137 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 09:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18130 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 09:07:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.18.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 09:07:17 -0000 Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107]) by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id DD51F4E29B; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:15 +0100 Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 01:07:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Zack Weinberg Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk Message-ID: <20021106090715.GA22059@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20021105191404.GB1050@egil.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021105191404.GB1050@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 > The merge tag is gcc-3_4-basic-improvements-merge-20021105. > Bootstrapped i686-linux; there are regressions relative to mainline, > but they are not caused by this merge. > > --- ws.main 2002-11-05 11:10:55.000000000 -0800 > +++ ws.bib 2002-11-05 11:10:41.000000000 -0800 > @@ -28,9 +28,12 @@ > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -O3 -g > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-constant.c execution, -Os > +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-1.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-2.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-3.c (test for excess errors) > === gcc Summary === > -# of expected passes 20539 > -# of unexpected failures 5 > +# of expected passes 20552 > +# of unexpected failures 8 > # of expected failures 64 > # of unsupported tests 65 > === g++ tests === > > I believe I know what is causing these failures, and will send a > separate patch for them shortly. If you will run into problem, just let me know and I will check it. After all I probably caused it. Thanks! Honza > > I would appreciate it if the HPPA maintainers would check the merge of > pa.c; the function-call rewrite on the mainline clashed a bit with the > conversion of ASM_OUTPUT_INTERNAL_LABEL to a target hook on the branch. > I believe I got it correct but I don't have access to this platform to > test it. > > zw