From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10122 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 23:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10077 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 23:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 23:59:48 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBBNuNJ25019; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:56:23 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBBNxfs13685; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:59:41 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBBNxe709433; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:59:40 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBBNxeA07075; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:59:40 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:11:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Peter Barada Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues Message-ID: <20021211235940.GF6975@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Peter Barada , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200212112045.gBBKjnQ13223@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212112045.gBBKjnQ13223@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote: > 1) Should general_src_operand accept the unspec symbol? Nope. > 2) If not, does anyone have an idea how I should get this instruction > recognized? You *may* want to wrap the unspec in a CONST. That would make the thing be recognized by general_operand. But I can't tell if that's exactly right, since you've posted no code. r~