From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24859 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 01:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24849 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 01:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 01:26:26 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Meaw-0004B3-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:26:26 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Mea9-00014K-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:25:38 -0500 Received: from host217-43-98-217.range217-43.btcentralplus.com ([217.43.98.217] helo=paul.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Mea8-00014B-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:25:36 -0500 Received: from paul (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paul.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D7642692; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:25:32 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Brook To: "Kris Warkentin" , , "Timothy J. Wood" Subject: Re: We are nesting functions now? Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: "GCC List" References: <06a001c2a1e6$782b2a40$0202040a@catdog> In-Reply-To: <06a001c2a1e6$782b2a40$0202040a@catdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200212130125.32615.paul@nowt.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 On Thursday 12 December 2002 1:57 pm, Kris Warkentin wrote: > It's a gcc extension. Probably in there for Pascal support. Also used by the fortran frontends. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2/gcc/Nested-Functions.html#Nested%20 >Functions Paul Brook