public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: basic-improvements call for testers
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021214185650.GJ7497@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

> 
> I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements
> branch.  My tests show only one significant difference between
> testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an
> additional failure of the libjava testsuite.  As the libjava test
> suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the
> mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it.  A pseudo-diff
> is appended to this message; if a test suite isn't mentioned, it had
> no differences at all between mainline and branch.
> 
> Please test the branch and report results using test_summary, but also
> copy me; I don't follow gcc-testresults.
> 
> I'm aware of three blocker issues for the merge:
> 
> - The 32x64 HOST_WIDE_INT problem, which I will be addressing shortly.
> - foobar-c.c lacking appropriate dependencies on coretypes.h $(TM_H),
>   which I will also address shortly.
> - The Darwin sqrt stub problem, which I don't know enough about to
>   fix; I'd appreciate it if one of the people experiencing it could
>   look into a patch.
I tried sparc and mips targets on rtlopt branch (that is based on BIB
branch).  On sparc I run into 32x64 host problem you mention.  Mips
bootstrap got syntax error.
So in short I am going to bootstrap mips and sparc32 now.

Honza
> 
> If you know of or discover other issues which you think should block
> the merge, please say so.
> 
> Regarding check-in policies, I would recommend the following:
> 
> - For the time being, nothing goes onto mainline unless it is also
>   going onto the 3.3 release branch.  To make my life easier, please
>   test and apply such patches on the basic-improvements branch also.
> 
> - basic-improvements is open for checkins under its usual rules,
>   i.e. Stage 2 patches only.
> 
> I'd like to get the blocker issues all resolved and the branch merged
> to mainline by Monday.  Any help you can lend is greatly appreciated.
> 
> zw
> 
> --- mainline/report     2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
> +++ 3.4bib/report       2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
>  
> -Compiler version: 3.3 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> +Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> 
>                 === g++ Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           7891
> +# of expected passes           7899
>  # of unexpected failures       2
> -# of expected failures         92
> +# of expected failures         90
>  # of untested testcases        9
>  # of unsupported tests         3
>  
>                 === gcc Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           20746
> +# of expected passes           20781
>  # of unexpected failures       6
>  # of expected failures         64
> -# of unsupported tests         73
> +# of unsupported tests         75
> 
>                 === libjava tests ===
> 
>  ...
>  WARNING: program timed out.
>  FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
>  WARNING: program timed out.
> +FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test
> +WARNING: program timed out.
>  FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
>  FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
>  FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
>  ...
>  
>                 === libjava Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           2772
> -# of unexpected failures       65
> +# of expected passes           2770
> +# of unexpected failures       66
>  # of expected failures         14
> -# of untested testcases        69
> +# of untested testcases        70

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-14 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-14 11:22 Zack Weinberg
2002-12-14 11:30 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2002-12-14 14:26 ` Andreas Tobler
2002-12-15 15:09   ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-15 15:28     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-16 11:45       ` Andreas Tobler
2002-12-16 11:49       ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-16 12:03         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 12:53           ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-14 16:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2002-12-15 11:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-12-16  4:51 ` libjava testresults (Was: basic-improvements call for testers) Mark Wielaard
2002-12-16  8:36   ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-17  5:23     ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-18  2:25       ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-18  5:18   ` libjava testresults Zack Weinberg
2002-12-18 10:23     ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-15  8:40 basic-improvements call for testers Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-15 15:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-16  1:17   ` Jan Hubicka
2002-12-15 16:29 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-15 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 14:55 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-16 15:08 ` Jan Hubicka
2002-12-16 15:51 ` Eric Christopher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021214185650.GJ7497@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).