From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7486 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 04:42:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7478 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 04:42:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 04:42:02 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBG4g1w26851 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:42:01 -0600 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:46:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200212160442.gBG4g1w26851@duracef.shout.net> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch? X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2 (I asked this on gcc-help first and was directed here.) I run a gdb test bed with several versions of gcc. I note that gcc-3_3-branch has been created, so I will pick it up and incorporate it in my test bed. My question: is it safe for me to stop testing gcc-3_2-branch? That is, what are the chances of another gcc release such as a "gcc 3.2.2" coming from the gcc-3_2-branch? I note that several of the ChangeLog's have been updated since the release of gcc 3.2.1 on 2002-11-20: gcc/f/ChangeLog gcc/cp/ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog gcc/ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog I'm just looking for some insight into the branch status here. My default plan is to keep testing with gcc-3_2-branch even after gcc-3_3-branch is created, as it appears to be active. Thanks, Michael C