From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22170 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 12:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22155 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 12:15:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nescio.wildebeest.org) (62.108.28.95) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 12:15:31 -0000 Received: from elsschot.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.26] helo=elsschot ident=mail) by nescio.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Nu9J-0002M4-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:15:05 +0100 Received: from mark by elsschot with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Nu9c-0002Ef-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:15:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 04:51:00 -0000 From: Mark Wielaard To: Zack Weinberg Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: libjava testresults (Was: basic-improvements call for testers) Message-ID: <20021216121524.GA8359@elsschot> References: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00873.txt.bz2 Hi (java@gcc.gnu.org added to the CC), On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:36:50AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements > branch. My tests show only one significant difference between > testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an > additional failure of the libjava testsuite. As the libjava test > suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the > mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it. That is strange. I tested both mainline and the 3.4-bi branch last night and the results don't look that bad. === libjava tests === @@ -56,17 +50,15 @@ FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test -FAIL: pr8823 execution - gij test FAIL: pr8823 compilation from bytecode -FAIL: pr8823 execution - gij test FAIL: pr8823 -O compilation from bytecode === libjava Summary === -# of expected passes 2881 -# of unexpected failures 8 +# of expected passes 2885 +# of unexpected failures 6 # of expected failures 14 -# of untested testcases 16 +# of untested testcases 14 -Compiler version: 3.3 20021215 (experimental) +Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) So on the branch I get 6 instead of 8 failures. Nice :) This was on i686-pc-linux-gnu with: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable Linux 2.4.19-k7 binutils Version: 2.13.90.0.16-1 glibc Version: 2.3.1-5 Also my tests on powerpc on the mainline don't look that bad. (Although there are some more failures there since on powerpc I include the results of the Mauve testsuite.) Could you take a look in the libjava.log file to see what actually goes wrong on your setup? Cheers, Mark