From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14222 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 22:48:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14202 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 22:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 22:48:53 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gBGMmIM25390; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:48:18 -0500 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gBGMmIT40832; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:48:18 -0500 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/09-18-2002) with ESMTP id RAA27342; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:48:18 -0500 Message-Id: <200212162248.RAA27342@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: Jan Hubicka cc: Zack Weinberg , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status In-Reply-To: Message from Jan Hubicka of "Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:44:39 +0100." <20021216224439.GF3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:52:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00956.txt.bz2 >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes: Jan> As I've mentined I am handling this with the other patch that disables Jan> the transfomration for C90 until we decide how to detect such systems. Jan> On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is required to have it (and Jan> thats why libstdc++ does it). I hope Richard will have time to take a Jan> look on these patches soon. Would you please include a pointer to the patch? I have been browsing your patches and cannot find one that fixes this problem. David