From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65053-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26515 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 20:42:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26468 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 20:42:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 20:42:32 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJKFwg31163;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:15:58 -0500
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJKgH201828;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:42:17 -0500
Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-45.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.45])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJKgHL26300;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:42:17 -0500
Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id B64BF1C10B; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:42:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:14:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
   overseers@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bugzilla for GCC project?
Message-ID: <20021219204225.GA31017@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
	Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	overseers@gcc.gnu.org
References: <20021219111445.A1200@attbi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0212191535260.2782-100000@dberlin.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0212191535260.2782-100000@dberlin.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01227.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:36:58PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> - the new hardware failed

We had a disk error which has since been corrected.

>> - the ISP which hosts gcc.gnu.org was about to go out of business

Not a problem any longer.

>> - Red Hat's IT department was not supportive of the hardware/network
>>   configuration and administration issues

The new system is now safely ensconced in Raleigh on Red Hat's hefty
internet connection.  So, it's close to going live.  Probably in January.

Didn't I make this observation recently in the gcc mailing list?

cgf