From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 662 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2002 11:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 648 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 11:53:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 11:53:38 -0000 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBKBq2W21193; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:52:02 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:14:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Volker Reichelt Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu, janis187@us.ibm.com, ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de Subject: Re: A testcase library Message-ID: <20021220125202.B1310@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <200212201240.NAA96057@numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200212201240.NAA96057@numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de>; from reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de on Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:40:49PM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01258.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:40:49PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote: > Since GNATS has its limitations with respect to searching for relevant > information about testcases, I started collecting *small* testcases > for easy grepping. Until now, I've collected (with the help of > Wolfgang and of course the submitters) more than 200 of such testcases. > > Maybe the testcase library is useful for other bug-hunters, so here it > is. I also wrote a little script that helps me keeping track of the > information. Maybe that is of interest, too. The library and the script > come with a small Readme, which you might want to read first. > > Comments and testcases for inclusion in the library are welcome. > If this is of interest I could post the updated stuff regularly. Good work, thanks. Unless they are already in gcc testsuite, shouldn't they all be checked in after converting them to dg (or c-torture) format, ideally on all of 3.2/3.3 branches and trunk? Jakub