From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25612 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2002 12:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25591 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 12:34:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de) (134.130.161.59) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 12:34:23 -0000 Received: from igpm.rwth-aachen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA68932; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:31:17 +0100 (CST) Message-Id: <200212201331.OAA68932@numa6.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:02:00 -0000 From: Volker Reichelt Subject: Re: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch? To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org cc: mark@codesourcery.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01261.txt.bz2 I'm all in favor for a 3.2.2 release, but I would suggest to wait with a release until more bugs get fixed. Currently we have about 34 bugs in GNATS that are marked as 3.2/3.3 regressions. Since (hopefully) many of them will be fixed for 3.3 anyway, it would be nice to have the patches backported for the 3.2 branch (at least the easy ones). Even releasing 3.2.2 a couple of weeks after 3.3 in order not to have two releases in the same timeframe would be fine IMHO. Regards, Volker