From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65296-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7012 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 19:26:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7004 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 19:26:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.123)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 19:26:45 -0000
Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 29025)
	id CA8494F8EA; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:25:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:49:00 -0000
From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: wilson@cygnus.com
Subject: update_life_info in schedule_insns
Message-ID: <20021227192545.GA9542@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01470.txt.bz2

Hello,

>  /* Don't update reg info after reload, since that affects
>     regs_ever_live, which should not change after reload.  */
>  update_life_info (blocks, UPDATE_LIFE_LOCAL,
>                    (reload_completed ? PROP_DEATH_NOTES
>                     : PROP_DEATH_NOTES | PROP_REG_INFO));
>  if (any_large_regions)
>    {
>      update_life_info (large_region_blocks, UPDATE_LIFE_GLOBAL,
>                        PROP_DEATH_NOTES | PROP_REG_INFO);
>    }

why the comment above does not apply for the second update_life_info
call?

Zdenek