From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65306-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2983 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 21:31:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2976 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 21:31:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 21:31:26 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBRLVEf19402;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:31:14 -0600
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:58:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200212272131.gBRLVEf19402@duracef.shout.net>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch?
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01480.txt.bz2

For what it's worth, my gdb testing shows no regressions between
gcc 3.2 and gcc gcc-3_2-branch%20021224 on native i686-pc-linux-gnu.

That is the *gdb* test suite; I'm not running gcc test suites yet.

Michael C