From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65492-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4777 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2002 20:45:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4750 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 20:45:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk) (213.152.55.49)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 20:45:15 -0000
Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18TTFY-0005oB-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:44:32 +0000
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:44:00 -0000
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: GCC still getting a lot slower
Message-ID: <20021231204432.GA22313@daikokuya.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01666.txt.bz2

Any idea what killed GCC bootstrap time in Mid-Dec?  This really must
stop happening; we're out of control.

http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/CINT/d-permanent/times.html

Neil.