From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11688 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2002 20:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11681 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 20:56:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk) (213.152.55.49) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 20:56:36 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18TTQX-0005pP-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:55:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:48:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Paolo Carlini Cc: Andreas Jaeger , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Message-ID: <20021231205552.GA22398@daikokuya.co.uk> References: <20021231204432.GA22313@daikokuya.co.uk> <3E120414.6030003@unitus.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E120414.6030003@unitus.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01668.txt.bz2 Paolo Carlini wrote:- > >Any idea what killed GCC bootstrap time in Mid-Dec? > > > Wild guess > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-12/msg00481.html > > ??? If so, ugh. Fat chance of finding out exactly what it was. Neil.