From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65569-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9198 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 17:54:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9122 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 17:54:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 17:54:04 -0000
Received: (from jakub@localhost)
	by sunsite.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h02HrWR19723;
	Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:53:32 +0100
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:54:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: aj@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline
Message-ID: <20030102185332.F1218@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <no.id> <200301021748.h02HmOnf010840@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <200301021748.h02HmOnf010840@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>; from dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca on Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:48:23PM -0500
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:48:23PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> There is another problem.  The call to weak_func has been turned into
> a sibcall.  It seems that TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL isn't being
> consulted as we don't allow indirect sibcalls on hppa-linux.

The call is not indirect, it is normal direct call
(even if weak_func is marked __attribute__((weak)) or #pragma weak).

	Jakub