From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++ "with" keyword
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 16:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030104162144.GA4897@daikokuya.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15894.64524.464371.216489@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Andrew Haley wrote:-
> Momchil Velikov writes:
> > >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:
> >
> > Robert> If you think "with" is valuable, then the task is to
> > Robert> convince the guardians of the C++ standard of this. If
> > Robert> you can't convince the
> >
> > Not related to this particular "with" discussion, but I couldn't
> > disagree more. A standards body should not invent language
> > "features", but rather codify existing (proven) extensions.
>
> I totally agree. A standards should not invent language features, or
> -- heaven forbid -- programming languages. The reason for this is
> pretty obvious, in that once a feature is standardized it's too late
> to remove it if it has some fatal flaw.
>
> See Algol 68 for what happens if you do it the other way...
Or C++ 8-)
Neil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-04 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-04 14:29 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 15:00 ` Momchil Velikov
2003-01-04 15:24 ` Andrew Haley
2003-01-04 16:25 ` Neil Booth [this message]
2003-01-04 17:35 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 17:59 ` Tolga Dalman
2003-01-04 18:36 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 18:54 ` Tolga Dalman
2003-01-04 23:32 ` Kevin Handy
2003-01-14 14:33 ` Fergus Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-06 13:07 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 18:41 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 13:03 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 13:39 ` Toon Moene
2003-01-05 12:56 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 18:22 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-05 12:56 Robert Dewar
2003-01-06 12:18 ` Andrew Haley
2003-01-05 12:44 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 3:16 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 0:38 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 0:29 Robert Dewar
2003-01-05 0:37 ` Kevin Handy
2003-01-04 23:27 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 23:36 ` Lynn Winebarger
2003-01-05 2:55 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 22:13 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 20:59 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 22:36 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 20:09 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 19:36 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 19:59 ` Tolga Dalman
2003-01-04 19:13 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 20:58 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 18:11 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 18:47 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 17:52 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 17:59 ` Gianni Mariani
2003-01-04 17:06 Robert Dewar
2003-01-04 17:22 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-01-05 11:33 ` Andrew Haley
2003-01-05 11:36 ` Toon Moene
2002-12-29 8:32 Norman Jonas
2002-12-29 12:46 ` Russ Allbery
2002-12-29 6:49 Erik Schnetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030104162144.GA4897@daikokuya.co.uk \
--to=neil@daikokuya.co.uk \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).