From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30421 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2003 00:38:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30391 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 00:38:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 00:38:34 -0000 Received: from roscoe.constant.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E191800041; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 19:38:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 01:55:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: gdr@integrable-solutions.net, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Message-Id: <20030104183632.51820821.bkoz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200212261708.MAA10791@caip.rutgers.edu> References: <200212261347.IAA14641@caip.rutgers.edu> <200212261708.MAA10791@caip.rutgers.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 >2002-12-25 Kaveh R. Ghazi > > * testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc (test12): Move to ... > * testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith2.cc: ... here, new file. I think I'd rather the subdirectory approach, on reflection. Thus: testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith and testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/01.cc testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/02.cc testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/03.cc ... testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/12.cc I realize this contradicts what I'd said before. Sorry for the confusion. I'd like to try splitting tests out into separate files. This seems like a good place to try this idea out. -benjamin