From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18797 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2003 19:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18790 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2003 19:36:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk) (213.152.55.49) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2003 19:36:10 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Uu2K-0001de-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 19:32:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 19:58:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Erik Schnetter Cc: Toon Moene , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Message-ID: <20030104193247.GA4976@daikokuya.co.uk> References: <200301041820.38821.schnetter@uni-tuebingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301041820.38821.schnetter@uni-tuebingen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 Erik Schnetter wrote:- > Why does g77 invoce cc1? I thought it would invoke cpp directly. Will > cc1 invoke the external cpp, or will cc1 rather use the built-in cpp > library? > > I thought, but I can be wrong here, that the cpp library doesn't really > support the "-traditional" mode any more, whereas the cpp executable > does. "cpp" is just a driver and never did any preprocessing. The preprocessing has been done by either cccp (2.95.x), cpp0 / tradcpp0 combo (3.0), cc1 / tradcpp0 combo (3.1, 3.2) or cc1 alone (>= 3.3). I think 8-) Neil.