From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13005 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2003 03:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12986 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 03:41:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 03:41:21 -0000 Received: from roscoe.constant.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA9F7800041; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 22:41:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 04:57:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Message-Id: <20030104213916.0e153610.bkoz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <200212261347.IAA14641@caip.rutgers.edu> <200212261708.MAA10791@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030104183632.51820821.bkoz@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 >| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/01.cc >| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/02.cc >| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/03.cc > >Furthermore, if possible, I would like to see files numbered after the >sub-paragraphs number in the C++ definition. That may make tracking >easier. Seemingly, yes. Why don't you give as complete an answer as you can, given this file and the twelve existant tests. How would you number it? -benjamin