From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65727-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23378 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2003 12:56:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23360 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 12:56:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 12:56:44 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 72B4FF2D87; Sun,  5 Jan 2003 07:56:33 -0500 (EST)
To: aph@redhat.com, toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Subject: Re: c++ "with" keyword
Cc: dewar@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20030105125633.72B4FF2D87@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:03:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2

> The Bottom Line: Extensions are like Sex; one mistake and you have to 
> support it a life time ...

Very nice, that's one to record for future use :-)