From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65742-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1463 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2003 17:59:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1447 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 17:59:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 17:59:20 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id E9176F2DDB; Sun,  5 Jan 2003 12:59:08 -0500 (EST)
To: dewar@gnat.com, lord@emf.net, mszick@goquest.com
Subject: Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question.
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ja_walker@earthlink.net
Message-Id: <20030105175908.E9176F2DDB@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 18:13:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2

> I have to strongly disagree with that observation.

I am talking very specifically here of the issue of taking register
renaming into account in register allocation and scheduling algorithms.
I certainly would be interested in any references you know of in this
area.