From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65921-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26730 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 02:59:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26717 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 02:59:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 02:59:39 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 4661FF2D47; Tue,  7 Jan 2003 21:59:28 -0500 (EST)
To: brane@xbc.nu, marcel_cox@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20030108025928.4661FF2D47@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 05:36:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2

I find the misplacement of local stack variables really amazing here. This
sounds like an easy place to make a significant win.