public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!?
@ 2003-01-08 22:15 Nathanael Nerode
  2003-01-08 22:41 ` Jan Hubicka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-01-08 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc; +Cc: jh

I confirmed it.

c-format.o differs
cppexp.o differs
cse.o differs
df.o differs
gcc.o differs
i386.o differs
profile.o differs
toplev.o differs
ada/ali.o differs
ada/lib.o differs
cp/call.o differs

I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess that Jan's patch for 
i386* did this.  Jan, is this possible?

--Nathanael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!?
  2003-01-08 22:15 Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-01-08 22:41 ` Jan Hubicka
  2003-01-09  2:06   ` Jan Hubicka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2003-01-08 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc, jh

> I confirmed it.
> 
> c-format.o differs
> cppexp.o differs
> cse.o differs
> df.o differs
> gcc.o differs
> i386.o differs
> profile.o differs
> toplev.o differs
> ada/ali.o differs
> ada/lib.o differs
> cp/call.o differs
> 
> I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess that Jan's patch for 
> i386* did this.  Jan, is this possible?
Hmm, possible, definitly.  I didn't get the misscompare when commiting and my
testing machine is down currently, but I will try to bootstrap on other
one now.

Honza

> 
> --Nathanael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!?
  2003-01-08 22:41 ` Jan Hubicka
@ 2003-01-09  2:06   ` Jan Hubicka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2003-01-09  2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Hubicka; +Cc: Nathanael Nerode, gcc, gcc-patches

> > I confirmed it.
> > 
> > c-format.o differs
> > cppexp.o differs
> > cse.o differs
> > df.o differs
> > gcc.o differs
> > i386.o differs
> > profile.o differs
> > toplev.o differs
> > ada/ali.o differs
> > ada/lib.o differs
> > cp/call.o differs
> > 
> > I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess that Jan's patch for 
> > i386* did this.  Jan, is this possible?
> Hmm, possible, definitly.  I didn't get the misscompare when commiting and my
> testing machine is down currently, but I will try to bootstrap on other
> one now.
Ok, it is my bug.  Somehow it didn't show up in bootstrap I made. Sorry
for that!
I am testing the fix and will apply it as obivous if it passes.

Thu Jan  9 00:42:31 CET 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
	* i386.c  (ix86_expand_int_addcc): Fix thinko.

Index: i386.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c,v
retrieving revision 1.505
diff -c -3 -p -r1.505 i386.c
*** i386.c	8 Jan 2003 11:20:21 -0000	1.505
--- i386.c	8 Jan 2003 23:42:10 -0000
*************** ix86_expand_int_addcc (operands)
*** 9999,10005 ****
  				       ix86_compare_op1, &compare_op))
       return 0;
    if (GET_CODE (compare_op) != LTU)
!     val = operands[3] == const1_rtx ? constm1_rtx : const1_rtx;
    if ((GET_CODE (compare_op) == LTU) == (operands[3] == constm1_rtx))
      {
        switch (GET_MODE (operands[0]))
--- 9999,10005 ----
  				       ix86_compare_op1, &compare_op))
       return 0;
    if (GET_CODE (compare_op) != LTU)
!     val = constm1_rtx;
    if ((GET_CODE (compare_op) == LTU) == (operands[3] == constm1_rtx))
      {
        switch (GET_MODE (operands[0]))

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!?
@ 2003-01-08 22:08 Nathanael Nerode
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-01-08 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

I've started getting a bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu, 
just today.

I'm verifying with a clean tree and trying to track it down, but I 
wanted to send a message quick in case someone else is seeing this and 
knows what's going on.

--Nathanael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-08 23:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-08 22:15 Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-08 22:41 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-01-09  2:06   ` Jan Hubicka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-08 22:08 Nathanael Nerode

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).