From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4191 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2003 17:49:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4136 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 17:49:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.31.2) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2003 17:49:46 -0000 Received: (from weigand@localhost) by faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.1/8.1.4-FAU) id SAA17783; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:49:31 +0100 (MET) From: Ulrich Weigand Message-Id: <200301131749.SAA17783@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Subject: Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes To: joern.rennecke@superh.com (Joern Rennecke) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:28:00 -0000 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <3E19B0A3.2074B34E@superh.com> from "Joern Rennecke" at Jan 06, 2003 04:36:51 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2 Joern Rennecke wrote: > P.S.: While I am at rewriting all that code, I think I might as well > replace uses of REG_CLASS_FROM_LETTER (*str) with > REG_CLASS_FROM_CONSTRAINT (*str, str) ; As a side note, I was wondering why the new-style macros all get both a letter and string (where the letter presumably is always guaranteed to be equal to the first character of the string?). What's the reason for this redundancy? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de