From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-67171-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25226 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 17:57:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25094 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 17:57:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 17:57:29 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id RAA22633; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:57:29 GMT
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma022350; Thu, 30 Jan 03 17:56:45 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11536;
	Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:56:45 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h0UHujj29007;
	Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:56:45 GMT
Message-Id: <200301301756.h0UHujj29007@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
Subject: Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:58:59 PST."
             <20030130075859.C16581@synopsys.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:42:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01652.txt.bz2

> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:02:22AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > 
> > jbuck@synopsys.com said:
> > > Please send me corrections or additions if you notice anything wrong
> > > or missing. 
> > 
> > Gaby also pulled in the change that fixed PR 9090, but didn't add the 
> > reference to the commit.
> 
> We need to re-look at anything Gaby pulled in between the release of the
> first pre-release tarball on the 28th, and the release of the second
> tarball on the 29th, because we now see failures from five different tests
> on GNU/Linux ix86 where there were none before (Paolo confirmed my 
> report).
>  

This change went in on the 27th, so I think it was in the first tarball.  
Gaby should be able to confirm.

R.