From: Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 02:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030131012818.GA23579@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3u1fq183c.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:22:31AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> I'm also seeing those failures with the tarball I uploaded but not
> on current version of gcc-3_2-branch (which will be the next
> iteration).
>
> I looked into the failures and cannot find out which patches could
> have possibly caused those failures. All failures seem to be
> "syntax error". I'm inclined to conlude that the environment I used
> to prepare the second iteration (which is at work) might be insane [it
> is the one which started the reduce/reduce conflit thread].
>
> I would like you run the testsuite again but for current CVS
> gcc-3_2-branch and report the results. Thank you very much for your
> time.
Gabriel, just a heads up. the tarball does indeed appear to be broken.
Building from the tarball shows the failures whereas building from CVS is
fine for me:-
tarball:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01382.html
CVS:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01325.html
It is probably the bison thing as Paolo suggested. But I thought the
maintainer scripts were supposed to adjust the timestamps so as not to rely
on the bison in the user's environment. Dunno.
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-31 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-29 17:07 Gabriel Dos_Reis
2003-01-29 22:45 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-30 1:28 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-01-30 23:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 0:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 1:58 ` Bison-1.875, again! (Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)) Paolo Carlini
2003-01-31 2:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 1:59 ` GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joe Buck
2003-01-31 2:14 ` Greg Schafer [this message]
2003-01-31 2:21 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 2:44 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-31 13:53 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-31 14:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 18:28 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-31 19:13 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-02-01 16:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-02-03 16:55 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-31 3:51 ` Greg Schafer
2003-01-31 5:28 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 13:51 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-31 14:18 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-01-30 15:56 Volker Reichelt
2003-01-30 17:57 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030131012818.GA23579@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au \
--to=gschafer@zip.com.au \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
--cc=jbuck@synopsys.com \
--cc=pcarlini@unitus.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).