From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8318 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 17:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8309 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 17:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (204.176.21.195) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 17:21:48 -0000 Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0VHKxN27437; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:20:59 -0800 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:28:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , Greg Schafer , Paolo Carlini , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Message-ID: <20030131092059.C27239@synopsys.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from gdr@integrable-solutions.net on Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:53:18PM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01779.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:53:18PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" writes: > > | On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Joe Buck wrote: > | > | > In that case, run > | > > | > contrib/gcc_update --touch > | > > | > before making tarballs. This will update the times of dependent files > | > to be newer than those that are depended on (I'm not certain if it > | > gets everything, but it can't hurt). > | > | The release script already runs contrib/gcc_update --touch. > > Then I'm wondering why things went wrong... Just a guess: you applied a patch that modified a parser, then you did a build to test it. This build picked up your version of bison. contrib/gcc_update --touch only does a touch.