From: "Håkan Hjort" <hakan@safelogic.se>
To: Reza Roboubi <reza@linisoft.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimizations
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030218175524.GA8638@safelogic.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E25F2BB.BA90B2C9@linisoft.com>
Wed Jan 15 2003, Reza Roboubi wrote:
> tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net wrote:
> [snap]
> > I mentioned this on the gcc-bugs mailing list, and Mark Mitchell
> > contributed a fairly simple load hoisting improvement to the loop
> > optmiizer which restored performance on Whetstone.
> >
> > If you look at the gcc-bugs archives for 1998, you may be able to find
> > this message thread.
> [snap]
>
> Thanks for this input. It would be interesting to see how the issue was fixed.
Sorry for getting into this so late.
Nobody actually posted the code generated by 3.3/3.4...
inline int mm(int *i) {
if((*i)==0x10) return 0;
(*i)++; return 1;
}
int main() {
int k=0;
while (mm(&k)) {}
write(1,&k,1);
return 0;
}
For Sun's Forte compiler one gets the following:
main:
save %sp,-104,%sp
or %g0,16,%g1
st %g1,[%fp-4]
add %fp,-4,%o1
or %g0,1,%o0
call write ! params = %o0 %o1 %o2 ! Result
or %g0,1,%o2
ret ! Result = %i0
restore %g0,0,%o0
I.e. it just stores '16' in k before the call to write, no trace left
of mm() or any loop, as should be.
Perhaps GCC now does the same after hoisting both the load and the store?
--
/HÃ¥kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-18 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-15 23:20 optimizations Bonzini
2003-01-16 10:53 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-16 11:03 ` optimizations tm_gccmail
2003-01-16 12:34 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-02-18 18:13 ` Håkan Hjort [this message]
2003-02-18 18:16 ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-02-18 18:17 ` optimizations Zack Weinberg
2003-02-18 18:40 ` optimizations Håkan Hjort
2003-02-19 5:02 ` optimizations David Edelsohn
2003-01-16 11:53 ` optimizations Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-14 22:58 optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-15 0:15 ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-01-15 5:10 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-15 6:31 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2003-01-15 17:37 ` optimizations Andrew Pinski
2003-01-15 17:46 ` optimizations Reza Roboubi
2000-03-10 1:46 Optimizations Virgil Palanciuc
1997-12-14 14:30 [EGCS] Optimizations meissner
1997-12-15 5:38 ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-15 11:29 ` Optimizations Dave Love
1997-12-15 15:43 ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
[not found] ` <19971216000653.24186.cygnus.egcs@cerebro.laendle>
1997-12-23 7:51 ` Optimizations Stan Cox
1997-12-09 9:52 Optimizations David M. Ronis
1997-12-09 11:19 ` Optimizations Jeffrey A Law
1997-12-10 10:46 ` [EGCS] Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-14 5:39 ` Philipp Thomas
1997-12-14 15:14 ` Optimizations Marc Lehmann
1997-12-14 20:14 ` Optimizations Jeffrey A Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030218175524.GA8638@safelogic.se \
--to=hakan@safelogic.se \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=reza@linisoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).