From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6535 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2003 22:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6528 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2003 22:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 23 Feb 2003 22:06:25 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1NM6PE02149 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:06:25 -0600 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 23:00:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200302232206.h1NM6PE02149@duracef.shout.net> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release? X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01558.txt.bz2 I notice that gcc-3_2-branch is still active. I'm curious about the possibility that there will be another release from this branch. My interest is that I run a gdb test bed and I test gdb with many versions and branches of gcc. If the answer is "yes" or "maybe" then that is okay with me and I will keep testing gcc-3_2-branch and report back if breaks anything, versus gcc 3.2.2, in my gdb testing. If the answer is "definitely not" then I can drop some testing. So I'm just trying to get visibility here, not force any decision. Michael C