From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32272 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 09:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32262 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 09:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.ncsl.nist.gov) (129.6.57.216) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 09:40:37 -0000 Received: (from galibert@localhost) by kerberos.ncsl.nist.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1Q9eU001443; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:40:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:10:00 -0000 From: Olivier Galibert To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: Matt Austern , Tolga Dalman , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria) Message-ID: <20030226044029.A1163@kerberos.ncsl.nist.gov> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from gdr@integrable-solutions.net on Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:37:43AM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01842.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:37:43AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Does -fobey-inline differ from __attribute__((always_inline))? Yes, with -fobey-inline you only need to change the makefiles, not the source. OG.